Skip to content Learn about the access keys available for Metadata.NSW
A NSW Government website
Metadata.NSW (beta)

Definition

A count of unique/individual children and young people involved in Risk of Significant Harm (ROSH) reports, during the reporting period.


ROSH threshold screening occurs at the DCJ Child Protection Helpline. A child or young person is at ROSH if the circumstances that are causing concern for their safety, welfare or wellbeing are present to a significant extent. This means it is sufficiently serious to warrant a response by a statutory authority irrespective of a family's consent (see References below).

Indicator Summary

Numerator

Denominator
No description available
Computation

A count unique Child Identifiers where ROSH Flag is equal to 'Y' and the Contact Start Date is in the reporting period.

See more
Disaggregation

This indicator may be disaggregated by:

Indicator Specific breakdown

Distribution/Table Path/Column Dashboard Filter Label
Child Protection Reporting - Base Data Asset CONTACTOR_TYPE_GROUP Reporter type
  PRIMARY_HL_ASSESSED_ISSUE_GRPD Primary helpline assessed issue
    Number of reports per child*

 

Geographic Breakdown

Distribution/Table Path/Column Dashboard Filter Label
Child Protection Reporting - Base Data Asset DITRICT_COMMON District
  DITRICT_COMMON Cluster*
  BUSINESS_UNIT_COMMON Business unit

* District has been recoded into cluster using the District Common variable.

Demographic breakdown

Distribution/Table Path/Column Dashboard Filter Label …
See more

Reporting Information

The Operational Business Review reports monthly.  

The Annual Statistical Report reports annually.

Published by the NSW Department of Family and Community Services.

Quality Statement

Accuracy of Indigenous Status Data
Statuses: [FACSIAR Data Governance Committee: Qualified, Oct. 13, 2023]
The accuracy of data held about Indigenous Status in current collections is poor for several factors. Firstly, the number of...

Framework Dimensions

Rationale

This indicator allows monitoring the demand for child protection investigations, including making resource decisions.

Alignment: This aligns with national reporting in Report on Government Services (RoGS)

Calculation rules

Computation Rule
Computation

A count unique Child Identifiers where ROSH Flag is equal to 'Y' and the Contact Start Date is in the reporting period.

Disaggregation

This indicator may be disaggregated by:

Indicator Specific breakdown

Distribution/Table Path/Column Dashboard Filter Label
Child Protection Reporting - Base Data Asset CONTACTOR_TYPE_GROUP Reporter type
  PRIMARY_HL_ASSESSED_ISSUE_GRPD Primary helpline assessed issue
    Number of reports per child*

 

Geographic Breakdown

Distribution/Table Path/Column Dashboard Filter Label
Child Protection Reporting - Base Data Asset DITRICT_COMMON District
  DITRICT_COMMON Cluster*
  BUSINESS_UNIT_COMMON Business unit

* District has been recoded into cluster using the District Common variable.

Demographic breakdown

Distribution/Table Path/Column Dashboard Filter Label
Child Protection Reporting - Base Data Asset ABORIGINAL_STATUS_GROUPED Aboriginal status
    Age*
  AGE_AT_CONTACT_GROUPED Age grouped
  DISABILITY_FLAG Disability
  GENDER Gender

* Derived from date of birth.

The Annual Statistical Report disaggregates by District, Aboriginal status, Contactor type (grouped) and Primary helpline assessed issue and District.

The Aboriginal-led Data Sharing: Child Protection and Out-of-home Care Statistics disaggregates by District, Aboriginality and Primary helpline assessed issue. 

Comments

Data ageing:

  • Data ageing is two months, unless otherwise indicated. Therefore, the data for this indicator will be available two months after the end of the month in which the data first becomes available.

Data/counting rules changes:

  • ‘Other’ in the ‘Other/NA’ reporting category for response priorities include reports marked as ‘no response required’ and those with the required information left blank. ‘NA’ (Not Applicable) relates to ROSH reports where additional children were recorded at the time of the field assessment. The data reported for “Other/NA’ in 2019-20 is not directly comparable to that reported in the previous years, because: the large number of ROSH reports with blank final response priority reported for 2019-20 were attributed to the Streamlined Response Pilot in Northern NSW District, where the Response Priority Tool was no longer being used to determine the response priority. ‘Not Applicable (N/A)’ mainly relates to ROSH reports where additional children were recorded at the time of the field assessment.
  • ‘Prenatal reports’ are reported under ‘Carer: other issues’ prior to 2012-13. 'Other issues' includes ROSH reports where additional children were recorded at the time of field assessment; hence, Helpline assessed issue is not applicable.
  • The data for non-Aboriginal children and young people also includes children and young people with Aboriginality status "not stated".
  • Prior to December 2023, the district reflects where a child or young person’s case plan is held at their first ROSH report in the reporting period. Since December 2023, if a child is reported at ROSH multiple times in the reporting period, the first ROSH report taken is based on their first safety or alternate assessment submission date (the first time they were seen by a caseworker). If they were not seen by a caseworker in the reporting period, their first ROSH report based on the contact start date (when the report was made) is chosen.
  • The Hunter New England District was split into Hunter District and New England District from 2018-19. This means that no data will be displayed for Hunter District or for New England District before 2018-19 and no data will be displayed for Hunter New England District after 2017-18.
  • Statewide Services also includes 'not entered', in most cases where reports don't require a field response after an assessment/screening is undertaken at the DCJ Child Protection Helpline.
  • The ‘Other’ reported in the DCJ District breakdown refers to reports which could not be classified under Statewide Services or a DCJ District or reports from the former Hunter New England District which cannot be split into the new districts.

Data limitations:

  • Nil.

Data source:

Origin

References

In 2009 the threshold for legislative statutory authority intervention was amended from ‘risk of harm’ to ‘risk of significant harm’.

The NSW Interagency Guidelines outlines what is meant by ‘significant’ in ‘risk of significant harm’.

  • “This means the concern is sufficiently serious to warrant a response by a statutory authority (such as NSW Police Force or Community Services) irrespective of a family’s consent.
    What is significant is not minor or trivial and may reasonably be expected to produce a substantial and demonstrably adverse impact on the child or young person’s safety, welfare or wellbeing, or in the case of an unborn child, after the child’s birth. 
    The significance can result from a single act or omission or an accumulation of these.”

https://reporter.childstory.nsw.gov.au/s/article/Significant-harm-policy-definition

Related content

Relation Count
Indicator Sets that include this Indicator 0
Data Sets that are used in this Indicator 1